Get Paid to Write at Home
Neither one of us claim to be professional writers. We are professional poker players. Furthermore, the ideas and concepts presented in this book originally came from tape recorded conversations between the authors. These tape recordings were not necessarily formatted exactly the same way a book would be and the language was not always grammatically perfect. This is occasionally reflected in the wording of this text.
More recently, the poker forums on the Two Plus Two Publishing website (www.twoplustwo.com) have taken over the serious discussion of how to play various hands. Well known poker player writers Mason Malmuth and David Sklansky run the website and contribute frequently to the discussions. You may find those discussions a bit heavy going when you first start playing the game, but they are fascinating reading once you start worrying about the more subtle points of hold'em.
CardPlayer.com A great site that offers many of the same resources as the magazine, but i n an electronic format. You can find many great articles written by some of the best poker writers in the business, including Glazer and myself. There i s also i nformation about where and when upcoming poker tournaments are being held and results from past tournaments. Barry and Jeff Shulman have done a great job with this site and also with Card Player Magazine.
But it's important to understand that this set of starting hand requirements is just a beginning. Honestly, I don't believe it matters much whether you follow this set of starting hands, Sklansky and Malmuth, Krieger, or any other intelligent poker writer. The areas in which the various writers disagree probably account for a tiny fraction of your results, either way. For instance, I don't think it will affect your long-term results a great deal if you do or don't play QTs for a single bet in moderately early position. Of course, in the short term, you might flop a costly second-best hand with it, or turn a monster-crushing straight flush, but over the course of your poker career, I doubt you'd be able to tell financially whether you played it three from the big blind or not. On the other hand, if you choose to play J6o there, or don't routinely get a lot of money in the pot with KK in that position, your results will suffer dramatically.
All in all, the last two articles were rough, complex, and assumptive. But they help illustrate how an understanding of simple probabilities can allow any player with a pad, pen, and a calculator to ascertain the superior of two alternatives. This preparation gives credibility to a strategy-far improved from a writer simply stating Reraising from the small blind is usually more profitable. And it can hopefully help prepare you to analyze other authors' arguments to come to your own conclusions. Until next month, good luck
10,000 and then find you can never claim the money There are numerous 'systems' being promoted that suggest you can use these bonuses to multiply your winnings - even play for free. That's nonsense. Bonuses, if they are based on the number of hands, will be returned to the house through the rake. Pick your casino based on play quality and the volume of table options. That's the real key to winning. I often get questions about how fair certain casinos are. One author has written a book claiming that there are dealing errors in one large casino that give players in the know a decided advantage. This writer does not understand the technology behind the
Neo-Tech has its roots in the constant financial pressures and incentives to develop the easiest, most profitable methods of gaining advantages. Over the decades, successful salesmen, businessmen, politicians, writers, lawyers, entrepreneurs, investors, speculators, gamers, and Casanovas have secretly searched for shortcuts that require little skill yet contain the invisible effectiveness of the most advanced techniques. I identified those shortcuts and honed them into practical formats called Neo-Tech.
Online gambling is increasing at a staggering rate worldwide Total revenues for online gambling worl
I often get questions about how fair certain casinos are. One author has written a book claiming that there are dealing errors in one large casino that give players in the know a decided advantage. This writer does not understand the technology behind the card dealing process at reputable online casinos. Electronic games of all types use random number generator (RNG) software algorithm to determine card outcome, the RNG algorithm is called into play
First off, I'd like to thank Doug for coming up with the idea for this book. Good ideas often seem obvious in retrospect, but I'm surprised no one had ever gone beyond the basics of tracking your poker results or how to use the Wilson Software Turbo Poker series to test your strategies. I'd also like to thank Mitzi Koontz, our acquisitions editor, for putting her faith and her company's money into this project. Kim Benbow did a great job editing our text tweaking here, querying there, and helping to fix the inevitable repetitions that crop up when two writers work in parallel. Thanks also go out to Mike Tanamachi for his interior design and to Danielle Foster for the interior layout.
Many of Cardano's examples dealt with rolling dice. Here he realized that the outcomes for two rolls should be taken to be the 36 ordered pairs (i,j) rather than the 21 unordered pairs. This is a subtle point that was still causing problems much later for other writers on probability. For example, in the eighteenth century the famous French mathematician d'Alembert, author of several works on probability, claimed that when a coin is tossed twice the number of heads that turn up would Cardano's work was a remarkable first attempt at writing down the laws of probability, but it was not the spark that started a systematic study of the subject. This came from a famous series of letters between Pascal and Fermat. This correspondence was initiated by Pascal to consult Fermat about problems he had been given by Chevalier de Mere, a well-known writer, a prominent figure at the court of Louis XIV, and an ardent gambler.
In Ed we have a man who not only plays poker expertly, presently at the S15-S30 or S30-S60 level, but who has recently moved up the ranks, building his bankroll by playing as low as S2-S4 and S3-S6. He is also a great writer, a brilliant guy, a graduate of MIT, and a major contributor to our website www.twoplustwo.com. With him as our co-author there can be no doubt that, if you want to learn how best to beat the bad players you will find in smaller limit hold 'em games, this book is the place to turn.
Ian Taylor is a professional poker player and writer. His articles have appeared in a number of websites and publications, mainly focusing on poker psychology, variance, and emotional control. You can find Ian posting on a regular basis in the Forum discussion group at Internet Texas Holdem. com.